ATL: BARRY - Post-Tropical

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
TropicalAnalystwx13
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2109
Age: 26
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:20 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

#41 Postby TropicalAnalystwx13 » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:19 pm

My best guess is that we've got a broad mid-level circulation across the northern portion of Honduras, with a developing low-level center just off the coast of the Honduras-Nicaragua border. That's good for 93L because it means it'll miss a good chunk of land.
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#42 Postby ozonepete » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:29 pm

Hurricaneman wrote:The perfect analog for 93L has to be 2005 Bret, had little time to develop over the BOC but just enough time to become a minimal tropical storm which I think this system may pull off at best


Here's a really good analog. TS Harvey from 2011. I remember how we had long discussions about whether it would get to TS so close to the coast and it did. It did it with the center moving right along the coast in this exact region. Look how similar. The main difference here is that this one will move more WNW instead of west.

Image

Image
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#43 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:43 pm

yeah cycloneye the convection off to the appears to drawing.the mlc/llc to it has bit more of northerly component the last several hours it looks like it might be off shore in the next 6 hours or so and ride the coast kr be pulled slightly farther north into the convection over the nw carrib
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#44 Postby ozonepete » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:45 pm

:uarrow:
YeaH Aric, I could see the center getting north of the coast tonight and staying over water until Belize. Has a window to make TD or even TS if it moves slowly, but might be moving too fast.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#45 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:06 pm

ozonepete wrote::uarrow:
YeaH Aric, I could see the center getting north of the coast tonight and staying over water until Belize. Has a window to make TD or even TS if it moves slowly, but might be moving too fast.


If you look at the developing feeder band its quite clear whats happening all that convection that is building to the north of is pulling the low to mid level circ north into it. the llc may end up developing or relocating of sorts in or under this recent burst of convection.

Image
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139331
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#46 Postby cycloneye » Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:09 pm

Since this morning when 93L was up,there has not been any Best Track positions nor 93L has been on the main NRL site because of a malfunction at the ATCF site. But the other site of Best Track files is working.

AL, 93, 2013061512, , BEST, 0, 125N, 780W, 20, 1009, DB, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0,
AL, 93, 2013061518, , BEST, 0, 130N, 794W, 20, 1009, DB, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0,
AL, 93, 2013061600, , BEST, 0, 134N, 805W, 20, 1009, DB, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0,
AL, 93, 2013061606, , BEST, 0, 137N, 816W, 20, 1009, DB, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0,
AL, 93, 2013061612, , BEST, 0, 141N, 826W, 20, 1009, DB, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, 1011, 150, 90, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, M,
AL, 93, 2013061618, , BEST, 0, 146N, 837W, 20, 1009, DB, 34, NEQ, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1011, 150, 90, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST M,

ftp://ftp.nhc.noaa.gov/atcf/btk/
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#47 Postby ozonepete » Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:09 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
ozonepete wrote::uarrow:
YeaH Aric, I could see the center getting north of the coast tonight and staying over water until Belize. Has a window to make TD or even TS if it moves slowly, but might be moving too fast.


If you look at the developing feeder band its quite clear whats happening all that convection that is building to the north of is pulling the low to mid level circ north into it. the llc may end up developing or relocating of sorts in or under this recent burst of convection.


http://imageshack.us/a/img211/7206/gdl.jpg


Yes, I see it clearly now. I was just going to post an image with a circle almost exactly where you have it. I expect the LLC/MLC to consolidate right in that area. If that happens it has more than enough time (and space) to make TD or TS before hitting Belize. The outflow is really healthy now as well so convection should keep increasing...
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#48 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:19 pm

Hey ozonepete... new image in.. right at the end of my red line... but on the new image you see the low level yellow clouds... check out the hook developing.... may be trying to wrap up fast.

run the loop.. at about 16.71° N Longitude= 83.43° W

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... -long.html

I would not be surprised if it went to 40 or 50 %
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#49 Postby ozonepete » Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:26 pm

Aric, I definitely see it, though I have it a little behind you at about 16.2N 83.5W.

Edited the position.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#50 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:28 pm

ozonepete wrote:Aric, I definitely see it, though I have it a little behind you at about 16.2N 83.5W.

Edited the position.


yeah general area.. that coord from the nasa site and my mouse lol and that hook would the nw side of the circ so your coord are prob where a llc may be developing.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#51 Postby ozonepete » Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:30 pm

Actually, with my edited position we basically have it the same. I agree they should go with 50%. This area has a history of producing really fast developers when shear is low. Likely due to the geographic contours and really warm SSTs.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#52 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:31 pm

ozonepete wrote:Actually, with my edited position we basically have it the same. I agree they should go with 50%. This area has a history of producing really fast developers when shear is low. Likely due to the geographic contours and really warm SSTs.


Yeah pretty outflow atm..


Image
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7284
Age: 43
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#53 Postby Hurricaneman » Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:32 pm

I currently put at least a MLC at 16.34N 83.47W but its probably a loose circulation at the surface if there is one so maybe me, Aric and Ozonepete are all right in the position and its possible that the system is still getting a slight pull to the north by the exiting trough in which this will become a more W track to north of due west
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#54 Postby ozonepete » Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:38 pm

Yes, hurricaneman, and I can really see an MLC developing there as well. Here's another image to show the outflow. Pretty impressive. It has what it needs to develop pretty rapidly now.

Image
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#55 Postby ozonepete » Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:40 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
ozonepete wrote:Actually, with my edited position we basically have it the same. I agree they should go with 50%. This area has a history of producing really fast developers when shear is low. Likely due to the geographic contours and really warm SSTs.


Yeah pretty outflow atm..



From that chart it looks like an anti-cyclone may be developing overhead. It's almost there already.

Very impressive for June!
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7284
Age: 43
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#56 Postby Hurricaneman » Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:43 pm

If this keeps its current organization going, another analog if it gets far enough north could be a weaker version of Alex from 2010, but not as far north in the BOC
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#57 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:44 pm

ozonepete wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
ozonepete wrote:Actually, with my edited position we basically have it the same. I agree they should go with 50%. This area has a history of producing really fast developers when shear is low. Likely due to the geographic contours and really warm SSTs.


Yeah pretty outflow atm..



From that chart it looks like an anti-cyclone may be developing overhead. It's almost there already.

Very impressive for June!


yeah! and pressures are falling in the area around 1006 to 1008
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#58 Postby ozonepete » Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:48 pm

Look at the latest rgb. That convergence zone / inflow band you noted, Aric, is blowing up convection along it and look at the explosion of convection near where we expect the center is forming/consolidating. Wow!

Image
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#59 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:53 pm

ozonepete wrote:Look at the latest rgb. That convergence zone / inflow band you noted, Aric, is blowing up convection along it and look at the explosion of convection near where we expect the center is forming/consolidating. Wow!

http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z174/philnyc_2007/satrgb2013-06-162215_zps5cc945bd.jpg


looking at the loop notice the convection right on the coast of the north east side of Honduras its nearly stationary and almost back building to the ese.. meaning the center may actually be plenty offshore where we have been saying it.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
ouragans
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 466
Age: 52
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 12:09 pm
Location: Abymes, Guadeloupe F.W.I
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#60 Postby ouragans » Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:53 pm

cycloneye wrote:the other site of Best Track files is working.

ftp://ftp.nhc.noaa.gov/atcf/btk/


OK this explains why tropicalatlantic.com didnot reflect 93L, and WUnderground did... Thanks for the info
0 likes   
Personal forecast disclaimer
This post is a personal point of view, not an information. Please refer to official statements for life-threatening decisions.

David '79, Frederic '79, Hugo '89, Iris, Luis & Marilyn '95, Georges '98, Lenny '99, Dean '07, Irma '17, Maria '17, Fiona '22, Philippe '23, Tammy '23
16°13'33.3,"6N -61°36'39.5"W


Return to “2013”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests